Motivation and the Workplace

Drive theory manifests through an internal state compelling the individual in a particular path. On the other hand, incentive theory functions the moment an external stimulus forces the individual in a specific direction. In motivation, incentive theory can be depicted as an external objective that can stimulate behavior. Instinct theory demonstrates that motivation is the consequence of genetic or biological makeup. As a result, every individual in a group of species is conditioned for the same motives (Jones & Page, 1987). This process of motivation can be referred to as a drive, habit, interest, belief, compulsion, desire, need, or instinct. This motivation is responsible for stimulating the individual to act. Certainly, this motivation can expound drives such as sexual activity, competition, dominance, and aggression. Moreover, it can explain the dissimilarities between female and male mating inclinations.

Evidently, emotion and motivation are cognitive occurrences that possess a cause and effect relationship. Emotion is the consequential feelings from the actions by a motive and also from the failure or attainment of a chosen objective (Jones & Page, 1987). Conversely, motivation could be perceived as that which compels a person to behave and act to achieve a preferred outcome.

This information is useful in comprehending that there is an internal organization associated with human behavior. Moreover, the knowledge helps in understanding that human behavior animatedly functions in its environment and has outlaid interacting processes. Humanity is motivated and goal-based. People look for goals such as obtaining nutrition and shelter to having aesthetical principles and devising logical processes.